AI-generated image
Author profile picture

As the world teeters on the brink of irreversible climate change, Europe finds itself in a paradox. Governments across the continent profess allegiance to the cause of mitigating climate change. Yet, simultaneously, they sustain a convoluted web of subsidies for the very industries driving us toward ecological calamity. The logic behind such a policy is bewildering at best and disastrous at worst.

Climate change isn’t a looming threat — it’s here. With brutal droughts parching our continent and floods inundating European cities, our environment screams for respite. For our survival, for the survival of countless species with whom we share our planet, we must reduce our emissions posthaste. The urgency is undeniable.

Slashing emissions is non-negotiable

However, as society strives to accelerate towards cleaner futures, governments ironically continue to slam the brakes, pumping billions into exemptions and tax breaks for the fossil fuel industry. These subsidies amount to a perverse windfall for the most polluting companies, effectively rewarding them for exacerbating the climate crisis.

Reports upon reports have underscored a simple truth: slashing emissions NOW is non-negotiable. A robust strategy to accomplish this involves completely abolishing fossil fuel subsidies. The impact of this approach could be transformative.

The proposition to phase out fossil fuel subsidies isn’t novel; it has been deliberated for the past two decades. Yet, it’s conveniently brushed under the carpet each time it gains momentum. This perpetual procrastination has become indefensible. It is an affront to the principle of ‘the polluter pays’, breeding inequality and perpetuating injustice.

Eliminating fossil fuel subsidies is low-hanging fruit

Eliminating fossil fuel subsidies is not a Herculean task — it is, in fact, low-hanging fruit. Such a move would unlock billions in funds, which could be redirected toward facilitating a just transition to a sustainable economy. It would level the playing field, share the burden of climate mitigation equitably, and give businesses the much-needed clarity to navigate the path ahead.

Furthermore, it would fuel innovation, creativity, and health — values Europe holds dear. Instead of channeling funds towards industries of the past, we should invest in the industries of the future — those that respect our planet’s finite resources and strive toward sustainability.

The time for talk is over; the time for action is now. Governments must cease their support for the fossil fuel industry. In the race against the climate crisis, every second, every decision, every subsidy counts. It’s time to stop financing our destruction and start investing in our future. Our children’s survival depends on it.

About this column:

In a weekly column, alternately written by Eveline van Zeeland, Derek Jan Fikkers, Eugène Franken, JP Kroeger, Katleen Gabriels, Bernd Maier-Leppla, Willemijn Brouwer, and Colinda de Beer, Innovation Origins tries to figure out what the future will look like. These columnists, sometimes joined by guest bloggers, all work in their own way to find solutions to the problems of our time. Here are all the previous installments.